Next OSADL Events:
|
Breaking News:
2010-05-17 12:00
The Linux task viewer is hereKernel developers are walking in user space and beyond
2010-03-10 12:00
Parallel real-time on multi-core systems with mainline LinuxSeveral tasks simultaneously running at real-time priority no longer interfere to each other!
2010-02-22 12:00
"Latest Stable" Linux mainline real-time 2.6.31 is out!Kernel 2.6.31.12-rt21 is our latest and greatest
2010-02-21 12:00
OSADL at the Embedded World 2010Industry needs Open Source - Open Source meets Industry |
OSADL Project: Real Time Linux Workshops
Real Time Linux Foundation Workshops since 1999
Real Time Linux Workshops
1999 - 2000 - 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010
Eleventh Real-Time Linux Workshop on September 28 to 30, in Dresden, Germany
Announcement - Hotels - Agenda - Paper Abstracts - Presentations - Registration - Abstract Submission - Xenomai User Meeting - Sponsors
Papers
Investigating latency effects of the Linux real-time Preemption Patches (PREEMPT_RT) on AMD's GEODE LX Platform
Kushal Koolwal, VersaLogic Corporation
When it comes to embedded systems, real-time characteristics like low-latency, deterministic behavior and guaranteed calculations are of utmost importance and there has been an increasing market demand for real-time features on embedded systems which are used in mission-critical applications.
There have been many studies on benchmarking Linux kernel but so far there is none focusing on low-power, small-footprint embedded systems like AMD's Geode LX embedded platform. This is what we are aiming to achieve in this paper. This paper presents results of benchmarking a standard Linux kernel (PREEMPT_NONE) against a real-time Linux kernel (with PREEMPT_RT patch) and also against a soft real-time kernel (PREEMPT) using the Debian Linux operating system on Geode LX800 platform. As the PREEMPT_RT patch matures further and integrates into the mainline Linux kernel, we try to characterize the latency effects (minimum, average and worst-case) of this patch using tests like GTOD tests, cyclictest, LPPTEST and LMbench with over half-a-billion data points.
The paper starts with a basic introduction of the PREEMP_RT patch and outlines the methodology and environment (like BIOS and Operating System settings) used for evaluation. Following that, we present our results with appropriate graphs (bar graphs, histograms and scatter plots) and discuss those results. We also look for any performance degradation due to the real-time patch a common concern for people who want to use the real-time Linux kernel.
The paper concludes with some future work that can be done to further improve our results by further tweaking the Linux kernel settings and discusses some important issues that need to be considered when using the PREEMPT_RT patch.

