From 2102b5e4ee5dbedca891b82b0e76810823aa1934 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:36:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 148/158] tty/serial/pl011: Make the locking work on RT

The lock is a sleeping lock and local_irq_save() is not the optimsation
we are looking for. Redo it to make it work on -RT and non-RT.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c |   17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-5.15/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
===================================================================
--- linux-5.15.orig/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
+++ linux-5.15/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
@@ -2336,18 +2336,24 @@ pl011_console_write(struct console *co,
 {
 	struct uart_amba_port *uap = amba_ports[co->index];
 	unsigned int old_cr = 0, new_cr;
-	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long flags = 0;
 	int locked = 1;
 
 	clk_enable(uap->clk);
 
-	local_irq_save(flags);
+	/*
+	 * local_irq_save(flags);
+	 *
+	 * This local_irq_save() is nonsense. If we come in via sysrq
+	 * handling then interrupts are already disabled. Aside of
+	 * that the port.sysrq check is racy on SMP regardless.
+	*/
 	if (uap->port.sysrq)
 		locked = 0;
 	else if (oops_in_progress)
-		locked = spin_trylock(&uap->port.lock);
+		locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&uap->port.lock, flags);
 	else
-		spin_lock(&uap->port.lock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&uap->port.lock, flags);
 
 	/*
 	 *	First save the CR then disable the interrupts
@@ -2373,8 +2379,7 @@ pl011_console_write(struct console *co,
 		pl011_write(old_cr, uap, REG_CR);
 
 	if (locked)
-		spin_unlock(&uap->port.lock);
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uap->port.lock, flags);
 
 	clk_disable(uap->clk);
 }