Return-Path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from rack3slot8.osadl.org (rack3slot8.osadl.org [127.0.0.1])
	by rack3slot8.osadl.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/CE-2010120801) with ESMTP id r1DGI8ST001143
	for <ce@thllin.ceag.ch>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:18:08 +0100
Received: from toro.web-alm.net (uucp@localhost)
	by rack3slot8.osadl.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with bsmtp id r1DGI8En001141
	for ce@mailgate.computer-experts.de; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:18:08 +0100
Received: from www.osadl.org (www.osadl.org [62.245.132.105])
	by toro.web-alm.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Web-Alm-2003112001) with ESMTP id r1DGHaCX009700
	for <ce@ceag.ch>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:17:36 +0100
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by www.osadl.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/OSADL-2007092901) with ESMTP id r1DGHWlq025563
	for <Carsten.Emde@osadl.org>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:17:32 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934297Ab3BMQRP (ORCPT <rfc822;Carsten.Emde@osadl.org>);
	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:17:15 -0500
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:59726 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S934358Ab3BMQNQ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:13:16 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bigeasy@linutronix.de>)
	id 1U5exP-0005iT-8G; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:13:15 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 06/16] softirq: Add more debugging
Date: 	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:12:01 +0100
Message-Id: <1360771932-27150-7-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4
In-Reply-To: <1360771932-27150-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
References: <1360771932-27150-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: 	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on rack3slot8.osadl.org
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on rack3slot8.osadl.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We really want to find code which calls __raise_softirq_irqsoff() and
runs neither in hardirq context nor in a local_bh disabled
region. This is even wrong on mainline as that code relies on random
events to take care of it's newly raised softirq.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---

 kernel/softirq.c |   16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.2.35-rt53/kernel/softirq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.2.35-rt53.orig/kernel/softirq.c
+++ linux-3.2.35-rt53/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ void thread_do_softirq(void)
 	}
 }
 
-void __raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr)
+static void do_raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr)
 {
 	trace_softirq_raise(nr);
 	or_softirq_pending(1UL << nr);
@@ -622,12 +622,19 @@ void __raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int
 		__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd)->softirqs_raised |= (1U << nr);
 }
 
+void __raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr)
+{
+	do_raise_softirq_irqoff(nr);
+	if (!in_irq() && !current->softirq_nestcnt)
+		wakeup_softirqd();
+}
+
 /*
  * This function must run with irqs disabled!
  */
 void raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr)
 {
-	__raise_softirq_irqoff(nr);
+	do_raise_softirq_irqoff(nr);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we're in an hard interrupt we let irq return code deal
@@ -649,11 +656,6 @@ void raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int n
 		wakeup_softirqd();
 }
 
-void do_raise_softirq_irqoff(unsigned int nr)
-{
-	raise_softirq_irqoff(nr);
-}
-
 static inline int ksoftirqd_softirq_pending(void)
 {
 	return current->softirqs_raised;