From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 13:26:39 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of
 assert_spin_locked

The distinction is that assert_spin_locked() checks if the lock is
held *by*anyone* whereas lockdep_assert_held() asserts the current
context holds the lock.  Also, the check goes away if you build
without lockdep.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Ympr/+PX4XgT/UKU@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220505182645.497868-6-ebiederm@xmission.com
---
 kernel/signal.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig
 static void ptrace_trap_notify(struct task_struct *t)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(t->ptrace & PT_SEIZED));
-	assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&t->sighand->siglock);
 
 	task_set_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY);
 	ptrace_signal_wake_up(t, t->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING);
@@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ static int __send_signal_locked(int sig,
 	int override_rlimit;
 	int ret = 0, result;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&t->sighand->siglock);
 
 	result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED;
 	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, force))