You are here: Home / RTLWS 1999-2017 / RTLWS Submitted Papers / 
2024-06-13 - 04:02

Dates and Events:

OSADL Articles:

2023-11-12 12:00

Open Source License Obligations Checklists even better now

Import the checklists to other tools, create context diffs and merged lists

2023-03-01 12:00

Embedded Linux distributions

Results of the online "wish list"

2022-01-13 12:00

Phase #3 of OSADL project on OPC UA PubSub over TSN successfully completed

Another important milestone on the way to interoperable Open Source real-time Ethernet has been reached

2021-02-09 12:00

Open Source OPC UA PubSub over TSN project phase #3 launched

Letter of Intent with call for participation is now available

Real Time Linux Workshops

1999 - 2000 - 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015

14th Real Time Linux Workshop, October 18 to 20, 2012 at the Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Announcement - Call for papers (ASCII) - Hotels - Directions - Agenda - Paper Abstracts - Presentations - Registration - Abstract Submission - Sponsors - Gallery

OS Noise - Linux vs. microkernel

Michal Sojka, Czech Technical University in Prague
Stefan Wächtler, TU Dresden

Computers are often used to perform various measurements. Benchmarking and hardware performance evaluation is a typical example. In this kind of measurement the computer is used to measure the time of certain operation. The precision of hardware clocks in typically more than satisfying for this purpose but the measured time is also influenced by the operating system. In this paper, we evaluate how does the precision of measurements depend on the operating system.

We developed a set of benchmarks to measure the characteristics of memory subsystem, the cost of task preemption and the cost of task migration between CPU cores/sockets. We run the benchmarks on NOVA microkernel as well as on two different configurations of Linux, in all cases on x86 architecture. We captured the data from several tenths of hours of running experiments and compare the obtained results. The measured values are in all cases very similar, because they correspond the properties of the hardware. In addition to the absolute values, we also compare the variance calculated from multiple (typically 1000) runs of the experiments. The results vary depending on the experiment, but there is a clearly visible trend in all experiments - the microkernel offers the lowest variance, Debian kernel sits in the middle and the highest variance is produced with a minimalistic Linux kernel (allnoconfig manually enabled the needed options). The results seem realistic and in the paper we try to quantify the obtained differences.