OSADL Realtime QA Farm
About - Hardware - CPUs - Benchmarks - Graphics - Benchmarks - Kernels - Boards/Distros - Latency monitoring - Latency plots - System data - Profiles - Compare - Awards
Default latency plot of system in rack #b, slot #6 (Load: CPU/Graphics, Long-term)
|
Rack #0/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #1/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #2/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #3/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #4/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #5/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #6/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #7/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #8/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #9/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #a/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #b/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #c/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 - Rack #d/#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 Special All - All RT - Optimization - Ethernet - Thumbnails - Next |
|
Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU E3845 @ 1.91GHz, Linux 4.19.37-rt20 (Profile)
Data to construct the above plot have been generated using the RT test utility cyclictest.
Command line: cyclictest -l100000000 -m -Sp99 -i200 -h400 -q
Total number of samples: 100 million
Resolution of latency scale: normal
Duration: 5 hours, 33 minutes, lowest P state: performance
Compare latency of primary with shadow system
The worst-case latency is NOT higher under extreme CPU load.
Results of all systems under extreme CPU load are combined on this summary graph.
The worst-case latency is about 20.90 times higher under graphics load.
Results of all systems with accelerated graphics are combined on this summary graph.
